![]() |
| coolpicturegallery.us |
In my last post, I came to the defense of passion, since it seems to have taken a major beating in the media during the past few months.
![]() |
| Flickr |
Some individuals are drawn to passion when talking about their careers- or potential careers- while others find the word about as useful as standing around watching two monkeys hug one another.
(Note: I suppose some people might have a passion for watching monkeys hug one another, but that's a different blog post all together.)
It is with these dual perspectives in mind that I began looking at the various approaches to passion from our headline grabbing writers, Aspen Institute founder and biographer Walter Isaacson, Linked-In CEO Reid Hoffman and professor/author Cal Newport. From their writings and public commentary we can see how they have painted the word "passion":
Walter Isaacson: Self-Centered Passion
![]() |
| petmd.com |
In a recent article, Mr. Isaacson spoke with the Huffington Post about the Aspen Institute's new focus on encouraging youth to serve America after graduation. He discusses the importance of doing something larger than yourself, which can be reached by doing some kind of service corps right out of college or high school. It might be a medical corps or teaching corps or the military- anything that serves other individuals.
It is in this context that he relates a conversation with Steve Jobs about following ones passion:
"We talked about the fact that it isn't just about your damn passion-- it's about doing something larger than yourself. It's about serving this world, helping others. So if you have a whole generation of people [who've been told, 'Oh, just follow your passion,' they're going to forget that there's some purpose in life."
![]() |
| mathrubhumi.com |
By first asking this powerful question, clients are better able to reach the goal that Isaacson says we need to reach: meeting the needs of others.
![]() |
| passionate about this poppycock dominic coulter |
While his point about fluidity certainly makes sense, I believe Hoffman's advice is best taken by first asking yourself, "What interests and abilities (and even passions!) are going to help me build a solid foundation upon which to build my framework?" Far from the vague and lofty question Hoffman rails against, this type of question is razor sharp.
Answering this potent question gives you self-confidence and a solid knowledge base from which you can adapt and thrive in ever-shifting work environments. It allows you to manage setbacks more efficiently and determine how you can best help in your profession. Moreover, you are then able to adjust your career goals as your passions, interests and needs change.
Cal Newport: Plain Ole Vanilla Passion Doesn't Cut It
![]() |
| coolpicturegallery.us |
In the same vein, Mr. Newport seems to suggest that conventional wisdom's version of "passion" equates to a pre-conceived fantasy, lacking authenticity until cultivated for several years. He instead uses objective terms such as "deliberate practice" and "unifying mission" to tell us how to get to valuable, satisfying work, or "Passion 2.0."
Newport's method definitely has merit; however, it works best when a person first takes the time to ask themselves, "What do I need to deliberately practice, cultivate and care about in order to develop a unifying mission?" Even Newport himself, on his blog, Study Hacks, reveals in his bio that he has a need to "decode" (great verb, by the way!) overly simplistic conventions for success such as "follow your passion." Rather, he says he "dive[s] deeper, looking to decode underlying patterns of success, in all their nuanced glory."
| "To nuzzle" is a good verb, don't you think? coolpicturegallery.us |
We all have pre-existing passions, fascinations and/or proclivities, no matter what you want to call them. Everyone has something-a function, let's call it- that they feel a relentless need to do, like "decode" or "guide" or "illustrate." These are functions that energize us and often make us lose track of time.
Of course, the way in which we express these needs will change over time. We may lose interest in a subject area or we may find that we evolve out of performing our once-loved function into a more nuanced version. Likewise, we may move into other roles that have lain dormant for a good while.
However, the essence of who we are, what we're naturally good at and therefore drawn to doesn't change. Good career guidance translates the need to do x or y or z into a sustainable career. It also provides the language and insight to help people articulate what they need to have in a career and why, before they determine how to get there. It gets you in the right field before you embark on the journey.
Which leads me to the conclusion of my series on passion:
Get in Your Game: Passion-filled or Otherwise
No matter how you view "passion", all of these methods work best once you figure out your foundation and what careers are in your playing field.
And when I hear my clients talk about wanting to follow their passion, I'm really hearing them say that they have a yearning that needs to be met, even though they can't quite articulate what that need or urge is yet.
![]() |
| Tumblr |
Through career coaching, individuals eventually discover that this "passion" is actually something they are driven to do because of their natural talents and interests, so that's when they have to ask themselves the razor sharp, function-oriented questions that I detailed above.





.jpg)

No comments:
Post a Comment